Tuning instruments on 417 and 528 hz ?



The Ancient Solfeggio Frequencies

In Ancient times they were apparently used Gregorian Chants, such as the great hymn to St. John the Baptist, along with others that church authorities say were lost centuries ago. The chants and their special tones were believed to impart tremendous spiritual blessings when sung in harmony during religious masses.

Solfeggio Frequencies include: UT 396 Hz Liberating Guilt and Fear RE 417 Hz Undoing Situations and Facilitating Change MI 528 Hz Transformation and Miracles (DNA Repair) FA 639 Hz Connecting/Relationships SOL 741 Hz Awakening Intuition LA 852 Hz Returning to Spiritual Order

Exemple of 528hz sound:




The thing is We've been cheated even on our music ! the natural tuning has been taken off to create a imbalance , out of heart synchronicity, out of natural tune. We've been disconnected from natural Love normally contained in the music !

Here's a video that explains some theory about natural tuning system and relation with life, chakras and love (it was initially a synthetiser retuning to Ancient Solfeggio, but goes a lot on theory and explanation):



++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


A very interesting discussion on Love528.com

The debate is about 417hz and 528hz tuning.


This page is for more advanced musicologists and technically curious musicians. Don Nicoloff and Len Horowitz answer questions and objections posed by Austrian musician, composer, and LIVE H2O concert organizer, Dainis Michel. Questions about 528Hz and 417Hz Tuning engage the trio in a sometimes heated discussion regarding the “Perfect Circle of Sound™” discovered by Horowitz.

Enjoy . . .

Dainis: Don and Len, thank you for taking the time to answer some basic and even advanced questions posed by Len’s discovery of “The Perfect Circle of Sound™” in which 417Hz and 528Hz are featured as the key “Resonance” and “LOVE/joy” frequencies, respectively.

Start with this basic question. What is the difference between 440Hz, the standard tuning that every musician typically uses, and 417Hz—what Len proposes is the real “A” note of nature?

This question interests musicians everywhere who are greatly in need of access to scientific information about these tones. Is there any "common sense proof" of the claims you guys are making about528 and 417Hz? It is, after all, challenging for musicians to read your information about the "’key’ of 528Hz," or the “tuning to 417Hz,” since most wonder if you mean themajor scale, minor mode, locrian mode, dorian mode, etc. . . . What "key" are you talking about?

From a professional musicians standpoint the phrase "the key of 528" doesn't make any sense unless you identify the type of scale you are talking about.

Now, when looking at the current piano tuning (and I reference Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piano_key_frequencies), we see that G#/ab are usually around 405.305. Interestingly, European tuning often places the A at 442 or even 443...Which means that when you play in Ab, you would be very very close if not exactly 417.

Len: Dainis, I am not an expert in music, Don is, so I will defer most often to him these kinds of questions, but let me share what I feel is the main difference between the standard A=440Hz tuning, and what we are saying is nature’s primordial, current, and eternal A tuning = 417Hz, or there abouts.

First you must realize, and I quote from Wikipedia, from the early 18th century when pitch began to be “controlled with the use of tuning forks (invented in 1711), . . . a tuning fork associated with Handel, dating from 1740, is pitched at A = 422.5Hz (info), while a later one from 1780 is pitched at A = 409Hz (info), almost a semitone lower. Nonetheless, there was a tendency towards the end of the 18th century for the frequency of the A above middle C to be in the range of 400 (info) to 450Hz (info).” So you can see that the earliest A tunings ranged from 409 to 422Hz.


Dainis: Dr. Horowitz, you wrote that Da Vinci and his mentors knew about the 417Hz frequency that is the 2ndnote of the original Solfeggio musical scale—RE (forREsonance febrisin Latin and simply REsonance in English). What are your sources? Why are you saying that? Can you prove it? How do you know what Da Vinci and his mentors knew?



Take the number 528 and reduce it, as the mystery schoolers did, to its single digit integer: 5 + 2 + 6 = 15, and 1 + 5 = 6. Do the same for 417 which resolves to 3 when you use this Pythagorean reduction method. Each of the nine notes of the “Perfect Circle of Sound” which Da Vinci encrypted in his “Vitruvian Man” cryptograph, deciphers to a 3, 6, or 9. This is not by chance. This is fundamental metaphysical musical creationism. This music is the core music of universal creation. We now have this confirmed from experts in mathematics, physics, and more.

It was Dr. Joseph Puleo who by Divine revelation, was shown the frequencies of the original six note Solfeggio musical scale encrypted in the Book of Numbers, Chapter 7, verses 12 thru 83. 417Hz is the second “Re” note (short for “Resonance”), and 528Hz is the “Mi” note (short for “miracle”). The two together produce a miracle resonance harmonic of 3 + 6 that equals 9, signifying completion in a mathematical and metaphysical sense. The numbers themselves are symbols of this knowledge. Watch the LOVE CODE docmentary DVD. You will learn for instance that the number “9” is a symbol of completion--spiraling up from earth to rejoin the wholeness in heaven.

Next, read the definitions of these six tones, especially the two notes, “Re” and “Mi” in Webster’s Dictionary. You will be astonished about the power of “Re” as it relates to the larger mechanical matrix or system of numbers forming the musical-mathematical spiraling universe.

Then there is the miraculous capacity of 528Hz, the LOVE tone. Dr. Lee Lorenzen, a world leading water scientists and nutritional biochemist taught me that 528Hz miraculously restores broken genes in DNA. It does this most logically through water resonance and cymatics. The DNA spiral simply flows with the vibration along the path of least resistance to be “miraculously” reunited with the other genetic segment(s).

Dr. David Schmidt, the scientists who pioneered LIFEWAVE resonating water patch technology informed me that 528Hz is nearly the precise center of the electromagnetic color spectrum, which is light green. This is the center of the rainbow and your heart chakra. Oriental physicians have said for millennia this energy vortex in human bodies is energetically transmitting green light around your heart.

Mathemetics genius Marko Rodin confirmed 528Hz as essential to the mathematical matrix and physical structure of the universe.

Now if you need more proof, simply tune to these frequencies and detect the difference yourself. You are not a fool, so why foolishly rely on my words or work. Experiment and research youself.

When I tune my guitar to 417Hz, which is easy to do with an inexpensive Korg adjustable chromatic tuner, and I leave my guitar plugged into a live amplifier, I often hear the guitar strings start resonating by themselves. They are picking up the general resonance of the universe, 417Hz, a primary frequency of the musical mathematical matrix upon with our universe and all sacred geometry is constructed.

For all these reasons and more, we understand 417Hz which is easy for musicians and vocalists to tune to, and 528Hz which is a bit harder, are very special tunings that have the capacity to vibrate humanity in sync with nature, balance, harmony, unity, and universal integrity. This is how you establish world peace, hold optimally-effective peace concerts, and impact people maximally emotionally, in their hearts, not just their heads.

LOVE528.COM

Dainis: Now wait a minute, if “Re” is 417Hz, then C or Do is 528Hz, more like our current F#...but so what?... Press the lever and the frequency comes out,...do you know what I mean?

Dr. Horowitz: Not really, but I’ll use an example that may help. We are told that if we tune to standard A = 440 tuning we can be as much as 3 Hz off and still have a harmonic resonance. Well you are right about 417Hz being very very close to a half note down from our standard tuning, but I am not so sure that further tenths, hundredths, or even thousands of a Hz frequency doesn’t make a potentially HUGE difference depending on whether these numbers decipher to 3, 6, 8, or 9. So this leaves us lots of room for conjecture and hydrosonic experimentation.

Nikola Tesla, like Plato and Aristotle, taught his students John Keely and Royal Rife, “If humanity only knew the power of the 3s, 6s and 9s, it would be a new universe.” Dr. Lorenzen showed me published studies that when bacterial colonies were exposed to antibiotics for 3, 6, 9, 12 or 15 minutes verus any amount of time that did not deciper to 3, 6, or 9, far greater germicidal activity was observed. Why? Simply because there is something metaphysically powerful operating when you use these numbers. Otherwise not!

Now consider your radio tuner for a minute. What happens when you go simply one frequency channel off of your favorite station. You no longer pick it up, or else it’s full of static. We can’t be sure at this point, we need more research to determine, whether the finer frequencies into the tenths and hundredths make major differences in everything from sound quality and psycho-emotional reactions to observations in biophysics.

Don Nicoloff: Dainis, let me add this. Ask yourself the question, "If my instrument is tuned to 440Hz, in what key shall I play?" The answer to that question is the same for ANY tuning frequency. We are recommending that musicians tune his/her instrument to these Sacred frequencies. It's not very complicated. YOU have to choose the proper frequency. Meditate on. . . . Becoming too technical or analytical becomes an impediment to what the heart can instantly feel and comprehend on a spiritual level. The audience will prove that in their response -- when they hear the music.


What is the "key of 528" or the "key of 417?"

I mean, is that the major scale based on those frequencies as the root? Can I play any mode with that frequency, so, does 417 lydian work? Can I play in minor mode? If I play a keyboard, I'll be subject to the same issues of temperament that have plagued keyed instruments for centuries.

My piano tuner is coming to my place . . . to work some of these issues out. I've already contacted his company, and I've asked whether it is even possible to get the frequencies 528 and 417 into one piano tuning.


Furthermore, when scientific results are claimed, I find it necessary to post scientific results. For example, play 440 to plants for a while, and then play 443.9935 and see what they like better. But then, who wants to listen to a drone tone? Play fun happy loving music with a 440 to plants, and they'll likely dig it. Then slide the tuning up 3.9 Hz...is there a difference or is it the message the music is carrying that is more important?

Len: I believe all are important, that is, the base frequency as well as the intent of the composer and attitude of the performer.


Is verification available? How are you getting at 417 for ancient solfeggio? This is not "skepticism," these are simple questions about musical realities.

Len: Now it is obvious you have not read my work, or watched my videos. You need to read Healing Codes for the Biological Apocalypse wherein Dr. Puleo showed the world the 417Hz frequency associated with the 2nd tone of the original Solfeggio is revealed in the numbers associated with the repeating inane verses in the Book of Numbers, Chapter 7, verses 12 thru 83.

Dainis: Okay, . . . The next thing is that I have a hunch that the real "root" frequency(ies) potentially of the universe...that the root frequency isn't a "three number" number. It's likely more like pi, (3.1415926...) something basically that could be "manufactured" but not calculated. Interestingly, you'll see that 443.9935 in place of 440 leads to key 55 is 627.902 . . . In the piano tuner pitch website I've listed here . . . that's close to "double" pi.

Len: This is what I was just saying a minute ago. Add these numbers up and what do we get. Perhaps with unending numbers we may not be able to use this strategy to determine legitimacy of this 3, 6, and 9 thesis.

Dainis: Another thing is that music just doesn't "sound bad" because of the 440. Music is like water, and it carries messages. If I get A 440 and then use that as the major third, and then my choir sings something in F major, the "quality" of the sound has to do with how well the choir listens, how spiritually in tune with one another the singers are, how well are the singers warmed up; did I do yoga/healing exercises in the warm ups, have I evened out the "egos" in the choir; how smoothly does the choir tune to the bass as well as to the resonance in the room. . . . Those things determine whether it sounds good or not, and that has to do with relative pitch and relative intonation...not root frequency.

Don: We agree with this, however, each of these human factors impact the fundamental frequency to either encourage harmony or create dissonance.

Dainis: Now, I'm not saying that adjusting root frequencies may not have particular effects, and that it's not worth exploring, I am however saying that the terminology and "science" need to be sound.

Even with A 440, if you check [CLICK] here: you'll notice that key 36 is 207.652, which is pretty close to half of 417. To get that note to be 417, I need to use something like 441.796 for A, which, however, leaves anything close to 528 categorically off the keyboard...unless my piano tuner can work some serious magic.

My piano tuners are http://www.dieklaviermachermeister.at/index.html, and they really are very good. I have started a dialog with them, and possibly, I will be able to help this movement with terminology and precision.

Dainis: The intentions of this event are so marvelously spiritually sounding, that the reverberations that are starting surrounding it are already magical.

I'd like to contribute by asking very concretely:

What note should we tune to 417?
What note should we tune to 528?


Len: My suggestion to participating performers is either is wonderful. 417Hz is easier to tune to and sing, I understand from my friends in the music industry. As I mentioned, simple Korg tuners and their new synthesizers can tune to 417Hz. 528Hz tuning is slightly more challenging as you need to tune by ear initially to a tuning fork. I created a 30 second sample of that tone free on the internet accessible by clicking HERE.

Dainis: A "normal" Ab is already 415.305, so it's actually really close, and a lot of orchestras tune to 442, which would mean that Ab Major/Minor (plus any other mode with the root Ab/G#) would be in the "key of universal resonance." Likely Db would be a good key, with Ab as the 5th too.

Len: I know this is accurate from tuning my guitar to 417Hz and playing along with CDs and DVDs in standard tuning. It is CLOSE, but slightly off to my ear.

Dainis: So, then, how to find 528? C is "normally" 523.251. However, tuning that much higher might cause strain on musicians ears, since the sound might be considered very bright.

Something related to C 528 since you and Dr. Emoto have invited Yoko Ono to participate in LIVE H2O. Not long ago I played John Lennon's “Imagine” in concert. From the video where John is playing the white piano and Yoko kisses him at the end...the piano has fallen in pitch considerably. I think even orchestras played with that recording and must have needed to tune very low. I've heard versions in normal C, even with John singing, and they just aren't as nice.

Len: I believe this is because if thier white piano was tuned low, then it was closer to what Haydn was tuned to in the eighteenth century, nearer to 417Hz, which professional vocalists tell me is much easier for most vocalists to sing.

Dainis: When I played Imagine, I played it in B or H, to honor John's original recording. But that was a tiny bit too low. So, just guestimating, let's say that John's piano slid down to a 420. That puts B or H at just about exactly 471, actually here are the actual numbers:

key 51 is 471.434
key 52 is 499.467

Which means that Johns C was something like 500 or 501, and that his 7th (or leading tone) in the piece was 471 or thereabouts.

Could that be one of the reasons the piece is so peaceful?

Len: Yes, this is quite possible. I know when I listen to people and instruments tuned to 417Hz or 528Hz I nearly always get a “breath release” indicating inner peaceful resonance, much like a yawn acquires.

Dainis: Could you ask Yoko, since I think this would interest her...and she can get in touch with me if she likes...I've enjoyed performing some of her avante garde works and I've always felt connected to her and John.

Len: I’d love to ask Yoko, but Dr. Emoto just informed me that he has lost her telephone number and e-mail address. So put it out to your network that we need to get in touch with her to facilitate her dreams of world peace coming true with LIVE H2O.

Don Nicoloff: Dainis, I’ve been sitting back listening to your comments and series of questions regarding "scientific" or "common-sense proof" of the validity of 528 Hz, or any other frequency considered to be part of the "Perfect Circle of Sound." Let me see if I can provide you with 'short' responses to your many questions.

To begin, "528 Hz" is considered as a desirable TUNING frequency because of certainmetaphysical and/or universal qualities found at that frequency. A frequency is nota "key." It is just that, a "frequency." The issue of "key centers" come into play once one adds intervals, i.e. melodic sequences, harmonies (simultaneous intervals), and cadences (chord progressions), whether consonantor dissonant.

Dainis: Thank you. I am glad that you recognize that a frequency is not a key, and it makes sense then to be confused by the phrase Len has been spreading, "528Hz is the Key of Love," since a frequency is not a key, and the phrase implies musical illiteracy. Ask a musician to play in the "key of 528Hz," and you would, as I would, simply state " you don't know what you are talking about and you are not giving me enough information to tune my instrument."

Dr. Len, however, you use the phrase repeatedly and you even had an article titled "Musicians can now perform in the key of LOVE" on one of your websites.

Len: You’re awesome Dainis. Thanks for pointing out my “musical illiteracy.” You are right about the fact I am pretty illiterate musically, which is why I defer all of my technical questions to Don, but having said this I must tell you that my role in relaying this musical intelligence and opportunity to humanity sometimes calls for word usage and phrases that best deliver the message to the illiterate masses.

Besides this, what is the “key to the House of David” that opens metaphysical or spiritual doors that no man can open or close? Is this a “frequency?” Did the authors of the Bible blunder by not correctly calling it a “frequency to the House of David.” I’m partly joking, and largely not.

In Healing Codes for the Biological Apocalypse I noted that John Keely may have made a similar “mistake” with the publication of hues (not pigment colors) of light related to musical notes. On the "G-Clef" with "C" being the first line below the staff and continuing up the scale and up the staff:

C = Red = Tonic
D = Orange = Super Tonic
E = Yellow = Mediant
F = Green = Sub Dominant
G = Blue = Dominant
A = Indigo = Super Dominant, Sub Mediant
B = Violet = Leading Tone, Sub Tonic
C = Red = Octave

Dinshah, the greatest Indian analyst in this field made a similar “mistake” as Keely and I did equating the frequencies to musical “keys” as shown in Dinshah’s Health Society chart:




I have been very interested in these charts and have always felt the need for more research and determinations in this field.

Dainis: So, obviously each frequency is not a “key” in the usual sense, and one frequency isn't a tune. Of course we need some kind of indication as to how the notes in the scale or "keys" should be tuned. Also, what do we do about the issues of equal temperament?

Don: The issue of the modes, harmonies, etc. only becomes relative when employing multiple frequencies.

Dainis: Yes, and although there are some compositions that "prove" otherwise, one frequency is not a scale, it's not a key, and it's not anything I can do anything with as a performing musician. Sure, I can tune my

48
g♯′/a♭′
G♯4/A♭4
415.305

a bit higher on my guitar and come to 417. OK, but tuning "high" also creates a particular sound...and for example Hawaiian "slack key" tuning is really nice and it's actually a dropped tuning and not a "raised tuning!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piano_key_frequencies
55
d♯′′/e♭′′
D♯5/E♭5
622.254

...so basically, we're not talking about music unless we employ multiple frequencies... which is almost too obvious to mention...

Don: Currently, "A-440 Hz" is considered to be the international tuning standard. Why is that so? And I remind you -- it doesn't matter whatkey you're playing in -- "A-440 Hz" has been decided to be the international tuning standard. Why? By whom?

Dainis: Wait a minute, Don, A-440 is not really the international standard. Orchestras play in 442, and some pianos at the University of Vienna are even tuned to 443. Some European orchestras play in 443. I've even heard about 444 and 445.

Here's an interesting thread I just looked up:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.music.early/browse_thread/thread/b5995b210fe08142

It says 440 may be a benchmark, but seriously, tuning is not that easy. The string section might tune sharp to sound more brilliant. Also, try to get a professional orchestra to play one pitch. Try to get them to all play A. You will hear a sea of sound with a whole lot of non 440 stuff. . . . And you know what it will be fuzzy. . . . And with the appropriate intent, it will be beautiful.


Don: Metaphysically speaking, "440 Hz" is a frequency divisible by two, and is structured as to remain locked into a 2-D or 1-D reality.

Dainis: I can imagine that this might be annoying for you, however, anything merely accepted as truth just simply might not be true. Why would something divisible by two lock me into a 2D reality? Why? 1D reality? Why? Just because it is divisible by two?

Even from the perspective of someone who is wholeheartedly interested in these frequencies, in healing, in expansion, in Divine LOVE, joy and sustainability. . . the argument is just really weak.

Just because it is divisible by two? Does that mean that anything divisible by 17 moves me into the 17th dimension? OK, well 17 X 26 is 442, so I'll tune to A 442.

Len: Wait a minute Dainis, I think the problem you are having has to do with your lacking awareness about the inherent metaphysical value of the numbers, again. Please read the referenced materials. The numbers 1 or 2 are not part of the set of 3s, 6s, 9, or 8s. 17 is part of the set of 8s. So you are mixing up the sacred spiritual frequencies upon which sacred geometry and phi is based, and the other numbers that regard more physical than metaphysical energy dynamics. That’s like mixing, rather than comparing, apples and oranges.

Dainis: I guess there needs to be more reasoned steps for me to even discuss any of these "findings," for example, with anyone in my doctoral seminar at the music theory institute here in Vienna.

I really need concrete statements that make sense.

Len: It will make more sense once you integrate the basic intelligence and Pythagorean revelations. Study Healing Codes for the Biological Apocalypse, and then LOVE the Real Da Vinci CODE. The certainty of, and rationale for, knowing the number 3 is metaphysically or spiritually different from the numbers 1 and 2 is very evident. To prove it, simply take the multiples of these numbers, and you will see multiples of 3s, 6s, and 9s, always give you 3s, 6s, and 9s. You can’t say that for the other numbers. They don’t give you such patterns.

Don: Dainis, physicality on Earth is a 3-D reality. The "440 Hz" frequency does not permit natural fundamental keys or natural harmonics to occur in a 3-D construct. Example: 4 + 4 + 0 (440 Hz) = 8 / 2 = 4 / (2) = 2 / 2 = (1).

Dainis: Don, I do not believe you. Pluck a string tuned to 440 and the natural harmonics will occur, and that is a physical reality. The first harmonic will be an octave, then a 5th, then a 4th, then M3, then m3, etc. There is no possible way that you can prevent the harmonics from occurring, it is the principle of sound. The ratios are 1:2:3:4:5:6:7:8, etc.

The only aspect that I find "fuzzy," which may allow your statements to flow with logic is "a 3D reality." If somehow, the natural harmonics resonating from 440 conflict with resonances found in nature, well, then we might start talking, but still, I am in 3D, and I can hear and experience 440 Hz just fine...so how is that possible? Why is it possible, given your premise?

Len: Dainis, you just answered your own question and chief objection to what Don is saying. 440Hz is not natural. Nature is not normally, nor optimally, vibing to 440Hz. It is vibing naturally, and optimally, to 417Hz. You don’t vibe well to a nuclear attack, but you experience it as dissonant on this 3D plain. That is the understading, the beauty, and the challenge of our discovery.

Don: The "Perfect Circle of Sound" frequencies follow the Fibonacci series, Danis. Here’s more scientific proof for you. And all the frequencies are divisible by 3. Example: 5+ 2+ 8 (528 Hz) = 15 = 1 + 5 = 6. 6 is divisible by 3. The other frequencies also result in numerological sequences of 3, 6, or nine (all divisible by 3). Such patterns or sequences do not exist in the realm of 440Hz. 440Hz is notfound in nature. In fact, it is an 'unnatural' frequency. Again, key center does not matter. What does matter is the matrix which is created with 440Hz.

Dainis: OK, that is interesting. How do we measure this matrix? Where are you getting your information?

Len: The matrix we are talking about is the musical mathematical matrix advanced by mathematician Marko Rodin who constructed the toroidal structure of the universe from simply mathematical patterns. He too came up with these same frequencies, or what he called mathematical patterns. This work has been confirmed as accurate by scientists and physicists globally. His work proves intelligent design for any reasonable and reasonably intelligent person.

Don: The 440 matrix forces energy on the
physical plain while violating or excluding universal principles which foster LOVE, joy, peace, compassion, health, and universal abundance (all spiritual or triune qualities).

Dainis: Umm...440 Hz does this? Well, then maybe that is why staying in tune is so hard! No one plays in tune it seems.

Len: RIGHT ON! Now your talking. The world has gone into unnatural dissonance rather than natural harmonics. This is why we have wars, environmental degradation, and self-destruction. OUR INSTRUMENTS ARE MISTUNED.

Did you every wonder why experts say we are walking around only using 5% of our brains? As if God created you to carry 95% neurological trash around in your cranium. Take it to the dump!

What’s wrong with this picture is the same story told in the Beatle’s animation, Yellow Submarine. Our instruments have been stolen (in this case mistuned), and the tunings have been secreted. Our colorful creative family has been turned into a fragile black and white falling apart with every bomb dropped. Our mission, with LIVE H2O, and this dialogue, is to recover the music that shall set us free to restore the colorful creative global village, filled with nature’s music, that Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band rescued from the Blue Meanies.

Dainis: But seriously Len and Don, what evidence to you have to support that 440 does what you claim? To me, I almost feel like I'm called to defend 440, and say...hey...it's just a frequency and it has just as much right to exist as 441 and 442. Why ascribe so much negativity to 440?

I argue you are ascribing negativity, which is projection and unfair, or your position has basis in fact. If it has basis in fact, please explain.

Don: 440Hzfocusesreality on the physical plane, excluding the more subtle spiritual frequencies. You can choose either. The world is obviously choosing 440Hz most popularly, and we are simply pointing out the overlooked probability that physical salvation and spiritual evolution rests in practicing and performing in a different set of frequencies. The frequencies of the masters, Plato, Pythagorus, Da Vinci, Tesla, Keely, etc.

The destructive quality of the duple frequencies, those exclusively divisible or multiples of 2, can be found at 2Hz, the most common (and destructive) frequency of an earthquake.

Dainis: OK, more information like this would be very helpful.

Don: When one uses 528Hz, or 417Hz, or any of the other frequencies in the "Perfect Circle" as the tuning center, all frequencies follow the same formula and are divisible by three. The significance is that these frequencies are supported by the creational Fibonacci series, as well asDa Vinci'sstudies in phyllotaxis, astronomy, and human anatomy.

Dainis: Wow! This supports my hunch that the actual frequencies are some kind of multiple of pi, or the acceleration of gravity, or something like that. Not, these "three number" frequencies.

What if I argued that your three number frequencies are satanic derivatives of the 666 energy? What if I argued that real healing frequencies have uncountable decimal places, and that you are leading sheep to the slaughter? With unsound reasoning and exciting rhetoric, I might just gain a following!!!

Len: Dainis, your reasoning is seriously flawed. You can also study the work of Russia’s top space-time physicist who determined that the energetic nodes in which all physical measures occur by nature are all 3s, 6s, and 9s.

And your argument that 666 is “Satanic energy” is standard Christian doctrine that disregards the fact that the devil created nothing other than deception. All the numbers were created by the Source of all creation, and used as a creative language. I know more about 666 than probably any person alive. I answered the riddle of Revelation 13:18. I tell you 666 is simply a material manifestation and prospering number. Each 6 symbolizes spiraling down from heaven into physical reality, typically prosperity. If you don’t believe me take a can of PEPSI and hold it up to a mirror. Count the numbers in the name and reduce it to a single digit. The Illuminati knows what you don’t. The Christian community has been deceived into believing 666 is evil rather than simply identifying evil. If I use the word evil as a descriptive, it doesn’t mean I am evil, just as 666 identifies evil without making it evil.

Don: In short, these "Perfect Circle" frequencies are in natural universal resonance, whereas 440 is not.

Dainis” OK, prove it. All you've stated is that they are divisible by three and not two.

Len: You are not hearing what we are telling you. There is a ton of intelligence regarding the importance of the 3s, 6s, and 9s throughout the world of science as well as scripture. Read the dimensions of Solomon’s temple in the Bible. Read the dimensions of Noah’s arc, being careful to consider cubit measures, not feet. Why does it require 144,000 people to sing a new song to bring about the Messianic Age in Rev. 14:1 (=6)? Because we are dealing with metaphysically empowering, that is spiritually enabling, numbers. The power for creation and intelligent design is all in the numbers! Why are water molecules triangulated? The same reason most cell phone towers are triangulated. The energy is increased using that structure. Why does Solomon’s seal and the organic chemistry ring, the Carbon-6 molecule of life, contain this six-sided sacred geometry? You are obviously missing the reasoned intelligence here.

Don: One must discard the tuning modalities developed around an 'unnatural' frequency: 440Hz. Piano tuning (or any other instrumental tuning) temperaments will not follow the samemathematical formulas as nature does if 440Hz is used. Temperaments have always been dependent upon construction methods, too. Harpsichords, 'Square' pianofortes, and pipe organs are but
a few examples of instruments that influence tuning temperaments.

Notice that I have not named one "key." This is an issue centered around fundamental tones that resonate with and abide by Universal laws. If you seek proof, do the math.

Better yet, try playing in those tuning frequencies. See what experiences you will have.

Dainis: That may or may not have anything to do with the frequency itself.

Len: Right. But we already covered that. We’ve already established other factors, such as heart felt intent, and the emotional state of the performers, bear on the outcome of the performance. So let’s not go there again.

Dainis: Sorry if some of my statements seem curt. I have a good number of professional musician friends and associates who may want to join in the discussion. However...the stuff needs to make sense....it needs to be "doable," and the "proofs" need to be more than untested projections or theories. Does that make sense? . . .

I'll be putting together a LIVE H2O event in Vienna, so reaching a core understanding here is a vital part of that.

Len: Naturally, you need to understand what we are talking about. And your devil’s advocacy position here only strengthen our message that musicians worldwide need to study the facts and make their own wisest choices.

Dainis: What if musician’s have already performed and recorded in 440. Can we digitally transpose older works like you are doing with Rosita Stone’s album?

Don: Others have asked the
same question and recently I had someone ask me about ProTools 7's audio and midi pitch edit functions on a semitone scale. That will not work.

Sound Forge (using the XFX1 plugin) will permit pitch adjustments over a 4-octave range. Each semitone has a 50% pitch adjustment (above and below) the mean frequency. Depending on your musical content, you will likely select 528Hz or 417 Hz as your mean frequency. Again, without hearing the music, I cannot guarantee that those are the only two optimal frequencies. The easiest pitch conversion of prerecorded music is accomplished with the final master mix. Be sure there is no (accidental) time expansion/ contraction. Otherwise, the tempo will change, and you will lose harmonic integrity.

Theoretically, the 528 Hz frequency is higher than "C - 2nd perfect partial," which is 523.252Hz.

Subtracting 523.252Hz from 528Hz = 4.748Hz. That is the specific increase in frequency to achieve 528 Hz.

You can do the same calculation with 440Hz to bring it down to 417Hz. Use the second partial of G# (415.304 Hz) as the fundamental pitch and raise the frequency to 417Hz (+ 1.696 Hz).

An audio frequency generator will provide a reference tone, though the description (above) will work if your music has been prerecorded at 440Hz.

That's as brief as I can make it and still provide a precise explanation. I use a Mac, and my software is both Mac-friendly and costly. The solution I provided should work within most musicians’ budgets.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++